giovedì, 09 ottobre 2008
foto_austerLet's start with one of Auster's quotations. I would love you to respond to it. So ... activate your brains and unlock your imagination. Let's see if as a starter, this can tickle your appetite for one of America's leading contemporary writers. "Whenever I complete a book, I'm filled with a feeling of immense disgust and disappointment. It's almost a physical collapse. I'm so disappointed by my feeble efforts that I can't believe I've actually spent so much time and accomplished so little. It takes years before I'm able to accept what I've done - to realize that this was the best I could do. But I never like to look at the things I've written. The past is the past, and there's nothing I can do about it any more. The only thing that counts is the project I'm working on now. Beckett once said in one of his stories, 'No sooner is the ink dry that it revolts me'". (from "The Red Notebook")
postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 17:18 | Permalink | commenti (52)
categoria:
venerdì, 10 ottobre 2008
FOOD FOR THOUGHT: In "Oracle Night" Auster claims that ‘randomness stalks us every day of our lives'. How do you respond to this? Auster is somehow fascinated by the quixotic fluidity of existence, its chaos, its lack of order, its inherent reliance upon the unpredictable, upon the twists and turns of fate, chance and coincidence. He seems to view life as tragically beautiful. Do you find these themes intriguing? Can you find any link to other writers you have read so far? What do Auster's themes make you think of? Hope to read your posts soon. I am really curious to see the way you will respond to this input of mine.
postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 11:10 | Permalink | commenti (48)
categoria:
giovedì, 16 ottobre 2008

"All this belongs to the language of ghosts.  There are many other possible kinds of talks in this language.  Most of them begin when one person says to another: I wish.  What they wish for might be anything at all, as long as it is something that cannot happen.  I wish the sun would never set.  I wish money would grow in my pockets.  I wish the city would be like it was in the old days.  You get the idea.  Absurd and infantile things, with no meaning and no reality.  In general people hold to the belief that however bad things were yesterday, they were better than things are today.  What they were like two days ago was even better than yesterday.  The farther you go back, the more beautiful and desirable the world becomes.  You drag yourself from sleep each morning to face something that is always worse than what you faced the day before,....."

This is an excerpt taken from Paul Auster's "In the Country of Last Things".

In the light of this short extract, can you try to figure out the meaning of the title?

Write at least one of you wishes, in line with the ones written by the narrator above.  Ideally, I would appreciate if you tried to write more than one.

Write at least a paragraph that completes the excerpt above. 

Go on working folks.  It seems that you are all asleep!!! Haven't seen any posts yet.

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 08:59 | Permalink | commenti (50)
categoria:
martedì, 04 novembre 2008

What does this passage remind you of?  Why?

These are some definitions of DYSTOPIA, which one do you prefer? Why? 

Is there one that fits the extract below better than another? 

After reading the short passage, can you come up with your definition of dystopia in Paul Auster's In the Country of Last Things?  Do you think it presents dystopic qualities or not?  What do the words chosen by the writer make you feel like?

A negative utopia: a place where instead of all being well, all is not well. Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and George Orwell's 1984 are the best-known fictional examples.

An imaginary society in which social or technological trends have culminated in a greatly diminished quality of life or degradation of values.

A dystopia (alternatively anti-utopia) is a fictional society that is the antithesis of utopia. It is usually characterized by an oppressive social control, such as an authoritarian or totalitarian government. In other words, a Dystopia has the opposite of what one would expect in a Utopian society.  Some academic circles distinguish between anti-utopia and dystopia. As in George Orwell's 1984,and Yevgeny Zamyatin's "We", a dystopia does not pretend to be good, while an anti-utopia appears to be utopian or was intended to be so (e.g. Aldous Huxley's Brave New World or Andrew Ryan's Rapture in BioShock), but a fatal flaw or other factor has destroyed or twisted the intended utopian world or concept.

Displacement

Excerpt taken from Paul Auster's In the Country of Last Things, Faber and Faber, 1987, page85-86 

In spite of what you would suppose, the facts are not reversible.  Just because you are able to get in, that does not mean you will be able to get out.  Entrances do not become exits, and there is nothing to guarantee that the door you walked through a moment ago will still be there when you turn around to look for it again.  That is how it works in the city.  Every time you think you know the answer to a question, you discover that the question makes no sense.  I spent several weeks trying to escape.  At first, there seemed to be any number of possibilities, a whole range of methods for getting myself back home, and given the fact taht I had some money to work with, I did not think it would be very hard.  That was wrong, of course, but it took me a while before I was willing to admit it.  I had arrived in a foreign charity ship, and it seemed logival to assume that I could return in one.  I therefore made my way down to the docks, fully prepared to bribe whatever official I had to in order to book passage.  No ships were in sight, however, and even the little fishing boats I had seen there a month before were gone.  Instead, the whole waterfront was thronged with workers - hundreds and hundreds of them, it seemed to me, more men than I was able to count.  Some were unloading rubble from trucks, otherws were carrying bricks and stones to the edge of the water, still others were laying the foundations for what looked like an immense sea wall or fortification.  Armed police guards stood on platforms surveying the workers, and the place swarmed with din and confusion - the rumbling of engines, poeple running back and forth, the voices of crew chiefs shouting orders.  It turned out that this was the Sea Wall Project, a public works enterprise that had recently been started by the new government.  Governments come and go quite rapidly here, and it is often difficult to keep up with the changes.  This was the first I had heard of the current takeover, and when I asked someone ther purpose of the sea wall, he told me it was to guard against the possibility of war.  The threat fo foreign invasion was mounting, he said, and it was our duty as citizens to protec our homeland.  Thansk to the efforts of the great So-and-So - whatever the name of the new leader was - the materials from collapsed buildings were now bieng collected for defense, and the project would give work to thousands of people.  What kind of pay were they offering?  I asked.  No money, he said, but a place to lvie and one warm meal a day.  Was I interested in signing up? No thanks, I said, I have other things to do.  Well, he said, there would be plenty of time for me to change my mind.  The government was estimating that it would take at least fifty years to finish the wall.  Good for them, I said, but in the meantime how does one get out of here? Oh no, he said, shaking his head, that's impossible.  Ships aren't allowed to come in anymore - and if nothing comes in, nothing can go out.  What about an airplane? I said.  What's an airplane? he asked, smiling at me in a puzzled sort of way, as though I had just told a joke he didn't understand.  An airplace, I said.  A machine taht flies through the air and carries people from one palce to another.  That's ridiculous, he said, giving me a suspicious kind of look.  There's no such thing.  It's impossible. Don't you remember? I asked.  I don't know what you're talking about, he said. You could get into trouble for spreading that kind of nonsense.  The government doesn't like it when people make up stories.  It's bad for morale.

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 11:27 | Permalink | commenti (47)
categoria:
giovedì, 06 novembre 2008

Look at the following photos (click on  the PDF file below) and decide which one best suits the excerpt you read by Paul Auster.  Be prepared to explain why (that is: explain your choice of the photo).

DystopianMovies

 

Then look at the following video clip.  Pau Auster's wife Siri Hustvedt, talks about consumerism and propagandaIn what way are they linked?  Can you answer some of the questions she is posing?  She raises some interesting issues and I would love you to be prepared to discuss them in class.  Your answers will certainly pave the way to our analysis of "1984" and "Animal Farm".

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 14:25 | Permalink | commenti (59)
categoria:
domenica, 09 novembre 2008

I'm sure you are familiar with Paul Auster's website.  Please visit it by clicking on the link below

www.paulauster.co.uk/

I would like to share with you the latest news:

Alejandro Chomski's film adaptation of 'The Country of Last Things' is due for release in 2008. It is being filmed in Argentina and will star Eva Green. It is currently in production.

A young woman (Green) searches for her long-lost brother in a bleak, futuristic dystopia where no industry takes place and most of the population collects garbage or scavenges for objects to resell.

According to the Guardian on Friday 24th October 2008 Paul Auster has added his name to a 200,000-strong petition in support of Roberto Saviano, and compared the threats of the Neapolitan mafia against the author to the tactics used by "extremist religious groups".

If you want to read the article click on the link below

www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/oct/24/mcewan-mafia-saviano-extremists

Last but not least, I would like you to watch the two short clips referred to an interview he delivered at HardTalk (BBC).  Watch the first videoclip (Paul Auster talks to Zeinab Badawi about 'Man In The Dark' ) and the fourth one (Paul Auster says there is a kind of civil war in the US and religion is the fissure point ). 

http://search.bbc.co.uk/search?go=toolbar&uri=%2Fprogrammes%2Fb006mg2m&q=Paul%20Auster&tab=av&scope=all

What are the main points he makes in the two short videoclips?  What is his latest book "Man in the Dark" about? What is the problem that according to the author seems to devide his country?

In the interview you watched on "Che tempo fa", Paul Auster mentions two personal anecdotes: his not having a pen or pencil when he met his favourite baseball player and his period of great economic difficulties when he lived in France. 

What do these two anecdotes tell you of Paul Auster as a man and writer? 

In the interview he explains better the meaning of the title of his latest novel "Man in the Dark".  What does he say?  Why does he think religion may be a problem in a country?  What does he appreciate about his country?  We know that now he is proud of the fact that Americans voted for the first black President in the history of the United States and he claimed this in a very recent interview.

If you have not had the chance to watch Fazio's interview, visit the webpage below

http://www.chetempochefa.rai.it/TE_videoteca/1,10916,1092562,00.html

Your books are on the way to our school! But before we start reading "Man in the Dark", why don't you listen to the first pages of the novel read by Paul Auster himself!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1ls5oqMEhk

Here for my students of 5H, there are some interesting comments on translation.

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 19:40 | Permalink | commenti (32)
categoria:
venerdì, 14 novembre 2008

smokeA Brooklyn cigar shop is the setting for this drama from director Wayne Wang that interweaves the stories of several characters that have fractured family relationships in common. Harvey Keitel is Auggie Wren, poetic owner of the Brooklyn Cigar Company, a store that he considers the center of the world -- a place where all of humanity eventually parades through. One of his regular customers is Paul Benjamin (William Hurt), a writer and a broken shell of a man whose pregnant wife was shot and killed near the store. When Paul's life is saved one day by a young black man named Rashid, the writer and his rescuer strike up a friendship and begin searching for Rashid's long-lost father. At the store, Auggie is surprised by the appearance of Ruby, an ex-girlfriend who informs him that her pregnant, drug-addicted daughter Felicity may also be his -- and is in dire need of help. Screenwriter Paul Auster based the script for Smoke on a 1990 short story he wrote for The New York Times.

If you are interested in the short story Auster wrote, why not watching the following video clip from youtube

 

While watching the film try to spot some emblematic cues (words pronounced by the actors), Auster is famous for them.

At the 1995 Berlin Film Festival, Smoke was awarded the Silver Bear, the International FIlm Critics Award, and the Audience Award for the Best Film.  The screenpaly also received an Independent Spirit Award in 1996. 

smoke film

Can you think of some of the qualities that make a film so special to win an International Award?  Bear them in mind while watching the film and see whether your  expectations were right.

Paul Auster had never written a short story when he was asked to do so by The New York Times.  He did not know whether he was capable of writing it and was about to give up when he opened a tin of his beloved Schimmelpennincks - the little cigars he liked to smoke - and started thinking about the man who sold them to him in Brooklyn.  That led to some thoughts about the kinds of encounter you have in New York with people you see every day but don't really know.  And little by little, the story began to take shape inside him.  It really came out of that tin of cigars!

However it is not a typical Christmas story.  Everything gets turned upside down.  What's stealing? What's giving? What's lying? What's telling the truth? All these questions are reshuffled in rather odd and unorthodox ways.

I will post some more information about the film after you have watched it! Enjoy the viewing on Wednesday.  

If you want to watch the trailer of Smoke, just click on the link below.

 

Last but not least, I suggest you listen to Paul Auster reading "Auggie Wren Christmas Story"

 

 

 
postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 22:27 | Permalink | commenti (47)
categoria:
domenica, 23 novembre 2008

face

 

 

In the film there is a sense of nostalgia for past days, when a local shop (in this film a tobacconist’s) stood for a meeting place where people could share their ideas, pay one another company and most of all feel united by common values (e.g. friendship, etc.)

What do you feel nostalgic of?

The sequel Blue in the Face, did not meet the critic approval as Smoke.  Can you say why?  Is there anything you did not appreciate of the movie?

Both in Smoke and Blue in the Face, the film director and the filmscript writer, chose famous actors or celebrities from other artistic fields.  Why?  What is the effect?

 

Can you explain the title “Blue in the Face”?  The dictionary meaning is “exhausted and speechless, as from excessive anger, physical strain, etc.”.  Does this make sense?

What is the view you get of New York? (consider not only the scenes, but also what the actors say about it)

 

 blue in the faceThe story goes that when director Wayne Wang and writer Paul Auster were making  Smoke, a story about the regulars in a Brooklyn cigar store, they felt such a richness in the characters that they were reluctant to stop after the filming was completed. With their star, Harvey Keitel, as a ringleader, they talked Miramax out of enough money to make another film, right then and there, on the same location, with some of the same actors, plus various celebrities they talked into doing walk-ons.
The new film, called  Blue in the Face, was shot in six days, and sometimes feels like it.  The movie begins well, with an early scene where Mira Sorvino plays a woman whose purse is snatched in front of the store.  Keitel races after the little boy who grabbed it, and hauls him back to the store, only to discover that Sorvino has taken pity on him and doesn't want to press charges. Keitel, who has seen a lot of purses snatched, tells her the cops should be called, and when Sorvino doesn't budge, what he does next follows a certain seductive logic.
The store's owner (
Victor Argo
) reveals to Keitel, his manager, that he plans to close down the cigar shop and sell out to a health food chain. Keitel tries to explain that the store is a valuable part of the neighbourhood - that people use it to touch base and stay in touch, and that when enough places close, a neighbourhood dies.
That theme leads to memories of the Brooklyn Dodgers, and the way that Brooklyn died a small death when they moved out of town.
There are memories of the Dodgers, augmented with flashbacks, and then a surprise visitor to the store - Jackie Robinson (famous baseball player), turning up like an outtake from "
Field of Dreams."

Here’s an excerpt that features the two best parts, monologues from Lou Reed and Jim Jarmusch:

Lou Reed on living in New York:

I’m scared of my own apartment. I’m scared twenty-four hours a day, but not necessarily in New York. I actually feel pretty comfortable in New York. I get scared, like, in Sweden. You know, it’s kind of empty, they’re all drunk. Everything works. If you stop at a stop light and don’t turn your engine off people come over and talk to you about it. You go to the medicine cabinet and open it up and there’ll be a little poster saying, “In case of suicide, call…” You turn on the TV and there’s an ear operation. These things scare me. New York? No.

Jim Jarmusch smoking his last cigarette ever:

Why is it in every movie there’s a shootout, and when they run out of bullets, they fling the gun away? Like it’s a disposable cigarette lighter or something. What’s up with that? Guns cost a lot of money. Can’t you reload it? You know what I’m saying? They always throw the gun out. And another thing in movies I think is real weird, like war movies, Nazis in movies.  Why do they always smoke like in some weird way…like this? [Holds cigarette upright, between ring and pinky finger]  Yah, vee haf vays of making you talk, Auggie.

 

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 18:12 | Permalink | commenti (45)
categoria:
martedì, 02 dicembre 2008

the inner life of martin frostThese are some comments about the film you are going to watch tomorrow.  As you can see, as usual, reactions to Paul Auster’s films are different and controversial.  So I am curious to know your personal response to the film.  

 

A fanciful and engaging metaphysical mystery about a writer, two beauties, love and the challenges of the creative process.

 

What starts out as a clever exploration of consciousness quickly descends into underplotted folly.

 

The inner life of Martin Frost reeks of misogyny and the film that enshrines his egomania makes half-assed aspirations to Goethe.

 

Paul Auster's suffocating romance makes you feel as if you're helplessly stuck inside the head of the most pretentious person you know.

 

Paul Auster's latest film is about the love story of a gruffly antisocial novelist (David Thewlis) and a strange young woman (Irene Jacob) with nonstop whimsical philosophizing about the subjective nature of reality.

 

This is a review I found and changed a bit to make it more comprehensible to you.

 

Martin Frost (Thewlis) holes up in a friend's empty house in the country to recuperate from a three-year writing jag. But his respite is extremely short-lived, as he hatches an idea for a new short story. He wakes up the next morning beside a comely, near-nude vivacious woman, Claire (Jacob), whose last name, Martin, is "coincidentally" his first.

They meet paranoid -- at least on his side, since Claire has a radiant smile that just won't quit. Introducing herself as the niece of the house's owner, seeking refuge to work on her philosophy thesis, Claire proceeds to charm the pants off her unwilling host and enable his process.

As Martin's prose progresses, Claire visibly weakens, until Martin, having apparently read Poe, sacrifices his art for his muse and fights to keep her in the "real" world, leading to Orpheus-tinged variations on "Ghost."

Auster throws in Michael Imperioli as a plumber-cum-amateur writer for comic relief. Imperioli, as it turns out, has his own otherworldly "muse," Anna (Auster's lovely daughter Sophie), who appears as floppily inchoate as Imperioli's unfocused writing.

The script inserted into Auster's 2002 novel "The Book of Illusions" and finally expanded to its present form and was shot in Portugal.

Auster's frequent voice-over narration clarifies just whose "inner life" haunts the enterprise, while Christophe Beaucarne struggles to find nuance in Auster's vision of paranormal creativity.

As you are already used to, I would like to refer you to youtube so that you can watch the trailer and other scenes from the film.  Enjoy.  See you tomorrow.  J

The Inner Life of Martin Frost - Official Trailer

 

 

The inner life of Martin Frost

 

The Inner Life of Martin Frost

DVD menu design (this is quite interesting! You will tell me why!)

 

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 12:04 | Permalink | commenti (43)
categoria:
martedì, 09 dicembre 2008

musicTomorrow’s film is based on Paul Auster’s novel “The Music of Chance”.

Below you will find two short reviews of the novel, so that you will get a general idea of what the film will be about.

 

Compulsive traveller Jim Nashe finances an epic poker match for a self-proclaimed jackpot winner. "In his lucid, captivating yarn, Auster quietly raises disturbing questions of servants and masters, of loyalty, freedom and the inexplicable urge to kill".



This insightful novel is a taut study of the self-contradictory mind living by chance while thinking it can get away with anything. Jim Nashe is a frivolous Boston fireman who needs music as a life crutch. His wife abandons him just before his father dies, leaving him money that he squanders aimlessly while driving around America. Near desperation, he meets a bitter young itinerant gambler, Jack ("Jackpot") Pozzi, who lures him into a losing poker game with two shady recluses, Flower and Stone, on their Pennsylvania estate. Nashe and Pozzi must retire their debt by building a stone wall on the premises: what this Herculean labour does to them is the novel's leitmotif. An interesting story, but some may object that the journalistic prose merely tells the story instead of showing it.books

 

This is a short review of the film

 

Documentary filmmaker Philip Haas made his dramatic feature film debut with The Music of Chance, adapted from Paul Auster's terse, existential novel. The film follows the plight of two hapless drifters -- Jim Nashe (Mandy Patinkin), who is escaping family and responsibility with an inheritance and a red BMW, and Jack Pozzi (James Spader), a down-on-his-luck gambler and world class manipulator. Pozzi convinces Nashe to shoot the works and put his remaining $10,000 into a high stakes poker game against two rich suckers -- reclusive lottery winners Willie Stone (Joel Grey) and Bill Flower (Charles Durning), who share a lavish but isolated country estate, using the remains of their lottery fortune to construct a self-contained world on the grounds of their mansion. Instead of bilking the two millionaires, however, Pozzi and Nashe lose their windfall and find themselves indebted to Stone and Flowers, who compel them to work off their losses by constructing a stone monument on their estate, a chore that results in deception, flight, and possibly murder. ~ Paul Brenner, All Movie Guide

 

music of

Look at the trailer

 

Look at some clips from the film

 

What are the main themes of this film?

What about the choice of songs? Do you think music emphasises the main theme of the film? If yes, How?

This is the first film we have watched so far that does not see Paul Auster as film script writer.  Is there anything in the choices of the film director that makes this blatant?

postato da: PaulAuster2008 alle ore 18:47 | Permalink | commenti (33)
categoria: